Top Consulting Skills: Ability to Understand, in Detail, the Current State

Things are not always what they seem, and the best consultants assume that many things are not at all as they seem. The current state is often a matter of perception. To complicate things further, each stakeholder often has a completely different perception from one another.

Often times, a consultant is brought on board by a senior manager or executive who has determined that there is a challenge that needs to be addressed that can’t be addressed internally. The business may lack the time, the expertise, or both, to solve the issue. So here you are.

The first thing most consultants will do is to speak with the executive to understand why they were brought on board. What is the problem from the executive’s perspective? What has she done to try to address the problem? What has work? Has not worked? Why?

While the executive may be a wealth of information and she will often speak with authority on the problem, simply listening to the executive and then driving to a solution would be a mistake. In all relationships, somewhere between “my truth” and “your truth” is “the truth.” This means that the consultant needs to talk to many stakeholders to get different perspectives. He must learn where there is alignment and misalignment. Where is there agreement and disagreement?

So, first, the consultant must find out who the most affected stakeholders are and talk to each of them in detail. As he speaks with each stakeholder, he should ask “who else will be affected by whatever decision we make on this matter?” The answer will present an additional list of stakeholders with whom the consultant should speak. In other words, don’t get a list of interview candidates from your sponsor, meet them, and call it a day. Look for additional perceptions that may be critical to formulating the right assessment of the current state.

The consultant needs to learn from multiple stakeholders at different levels in the organization:

1. What are the motivations of each stakeholder? How do those motivations shape the stakeholder’s point of view?
2. What is believed to be the problem? How is each affected by the problem?
3. What symptoms are presenting themselves in support of the problem statement?
4. What have they tried to solve the problem? What has worked? Not worked?

Individuals can be motivated in a lot of different ways. Some will be motivated by a successful outcome - finding the best way to resolve the issue and drive forward successfully. Others are motivated by fear. “If I talk to these guys, will I loose my job or sense of autonomy or ownership of the solution?” Knowing how one is motivated allows you to frame questions in a way that allows the stakeholder to be the most receptive and to apply judgement to the information you are gathering.

Additionally, many of us will often confuse the symptom with the problem. Is the problem that we have too many meetings making it hard to get work done, or is the crazy meeting schedule a symptom of some other problem, such as a lack of clear direction, lack of clear decision making ground rules, or lack of sufficient resources.

Getting to the heart of the current state is a critical first step in the consultative process. Do not get consumed with solving the problem at this point. Just stay focused on understanding what’s going on. You will get to problem resolution later.